Spencer CM, Goa KL and Gillis JC.
Tacrolimus. An update of its pharmacology and clinical
efficacy in the management of organ transplantation.
Drugs 1997;54(6):925-75.
Adis International Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.
demail@adis.co.nz
Tacrolimus (FK 506) has been evaluated as immunosuppressive
therapy in patients with a variety of solid organ and other
transplants. Extensive data have now confirmed its efficacy as
primary or rescue therapy in renal and hepatic transplantation.
In prospective and historically controlled studies of primary
therapy, tacrolimus generally demonstrated greater efficacy than
the conventional formulation of cyclosporin for preventing
episodes of acute rejection and allowed reduction of
corticosteroid use. Chronic rejection rates were also
significantly lower with tacrolimus in a large randomised liver
transplantation trial. However, patient and graft survival rates
were similar in both treatment groups (although numerically
larger in adults with liver transplants). In children, rejection
rates and corticosteroid requirements were usually lower with
tacrolimus and patient and graft survival were generally similar
with the 2 immunosuppressants. The finding of reduced
corticosteroid requirements with tacrolimus may be of particular
benefit in prepubertal children, who are still growing. A small
amount of evidence has also accumulated regarding the use of
tacrolimus as primary therapy in patients who have undergone
bone marrow or heart and/or lung transplantation. Data are not
conclusive, particularly in children, but tacrolimus appears to
be useful for treating patients who have undergone these organ
transplantations and may be associated with a lower incidence of
obliterative bronchiolitis than cyclosporin in the latter group.
Potential efficacy has also been shown in a limited number of
patients with pancreas or pancreas-kidney, pancreatic islet and
intestinal or multivisceral transplants, and in children who
have undergone heart or heart-lung transplantation. Tacrolimus
also has a use as rescue therapy in bone marrow, heart, lung and
pancreatic transplantation, but data are currently insufficient
for conclusions to be made. However, these results support the
need for further study in these populations. Adverse effects
occurring during tacrolimus therapy are generally of the type
common to all immunosuppressive regimens. However, diabetes
mellitus, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity are more common in
tacrolimus than cyclosporin recipients. Hyperlipidaemia,
hypertension, hirsutism and gingival hyperplasia are more common
with cyclosporin. In 2 large multicentre clinical trials (US
liver and European renal), tacrolimus was discontinued more
frequently during the first year because of adverse events.
However, the tolerability of tacrolimus appears related to
dosage, improving as the dose is reduced. Tacrolimus should be
considered an effective primary immunosuppressant in renal and
hepatic transplantation. The drug is also a useful agent for
rescue therapy in patients experiencing rejection or poor
tolerability to cyclosporin. Thus, tacrolimus provides the
clinician with an effective option for patients requiring
immunosuppression and, with a different tolerability and
efficacy profile to cyclosporin, it will better allow the
tailoring of therapy to meet the needs of individual patients.
PMID: 9421697 |